Aston Villa: What is the point of a third-choice keeper?
I'VE always thought a third-choice goalkeeper is about as much use as a third nipple (although I've got neither so I'm perhaps not best qualified to comment).
Which is why I can't help thinking Aston Villa's new signing Andy Marshall might prove to be nothing more than a nubbin, a thripple, a trip-nip or whatever the vernacular is.
If you've got a pair in perfectly fine working order then why do you need a third? Marshall, I fear, like Stuart Taylor before him, could just end up looking like a spare part.
And with keepers, if not with nips, if anything goes wrong with either of the originals there is always scope for an emergency loan or the opportunity to promote one of the kids.
I fail to see the point of paying Marshall - experienced, reliable stopper though he undoubtedly is - for a year when, chances are, he will be used less than a superfluous teat.
I've got nothing against the former Norwich, Ipswich and Coventry stopper and I'm sure the 34-year-old represents a safer pair of hands than academy graduate Elliott Parish right now.
But Marshall will probably provide more of an obstacle to Parish's first team hopes than he will to Premier League attackers at a time when the young keeper is seeing peers like Marc Albrighton get their chance.
I accept that clubs attempting to compete on several fronts need cover in all areas of the pitch, but I really wish these third-choice keepers could be nipped in the bud.
Older/Newer
« Aston Villa: Surely the only shock is the fact people were shocked? | Aston Villa webchat with Mat Kendrick »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Aston Villa: What is the point of a third-choice keeper? . TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.villabanter.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt421/mt-tb.cgi/145646
Manccity playing Kasper Schmeichel tonight.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c0/Kasper_Schmeichel_Bury.png/200px-Kasper_Schmeichel_Bury.png[/img]
Well why not have a 3rd goalkeeper? I believe we did go for an emergency goalkeeper 2 years ago who went by the name of Gabor Kiraly and look what a disaster HE proved to be!
How I see it is its a no-lose situation. Villa get an experienced, reliable under-under-study whilst he gets to cash in on premier league wages before the end of his career, besides Manchester United used all three of their goalkeepers Foster, Kuszack and Van der Sar last year so I don't see the problem.